From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267134AbTGKX5t (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 19:57:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267166AbTGKX5s (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 19:57:48 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:49555 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267134AbTGKX5n (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 19:57:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 17:08:58 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Alan Cox Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Sound updating, security of strlcpy and a question on pci v unload Message-ID: <20030712000858.GA23659@kroah.com> References: <1057943137.20637.27.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1057943137.20637.27.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 06:05:37PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Secondly a question. pci_driver structures seem to lack an owner: field. > What stops a 2.5 module unload occuring while pci is calling the probe > function having seen a new device ? The pci subsystem rw semaphore. thanks, greg k-h