From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265486AbTGLMwQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jul 2003 08:52:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265500AbTGLMwQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jul 2003 08:52:16 -0400 Received: from h234n2fls24o900.bredband.comhem.se ([217.208.132.234]:52960 "EHLO oden.fish.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265486AbTGLMwP (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jul 2003 08:52:15 -0400 Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 15:07:39 +0200 From: Voluspa To: ivg2@cornell.edu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.75 does not boot - TCQ oops Message-Id: <20030712150739.6f1d9700.lista1@telia.com> In-Reply-To: <200307120646.01060.ivg2@cornell.edu> References: <200307120646.01060.ivg2@cornell.edu> Organization: The Foggy One X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 06:46:01 -0400 Ivan Gyurdiev wrote: [...] > However, the kernel that crashed was using the default > (The default is 8, even though the comment says 32). Some nice testing you've done there. Yeah, the 'map vs reality' is confusing when configuring. I previously changed the 8 to 32, following the help, but for 2.5.75 changed it to 8 based on an offhand comment on lkml saying: '8 has been tested as optimal'. Hope LinuxTag isn't drawing all the developers attention away from your problem! Mvh Mats Johannesson