From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270212AbTGMKqA (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2003 06:46:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270214AbTGMKqA (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2003 06:46:00 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:64262 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270212AbTGMKp7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2003 06:45:59 -0400 Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 12:00:40 +0100 From: Russell King To: Jaakko Niemi Cc: Alan Cox , Wiktor Wodecki , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: hang with pcmcia wlan card Message-ID: <20030713120040.C2621@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Jaakko Niemi , Alan Cox , Wiktor Wodecki , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <87fzldxcf5.fsf@jumper.lonesom.pp.fi> <873chbyasi.fsf@jumper.lonesom.pp.fi> <20030712173039.A17432@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20030712164855.GB2133@gmx.de> <1058086011.31919.39.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> <87wuemg3h2.fsf@jumper.lonesom.pp.fi> <20030713110016.A2621@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <87he5qg0sp.fsf@jumper.lonesom.pp.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <87he5qg0sp.fsf@jumper.lonesom.pp.fi>; from liiwi@lonesom.pp.fi on Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 01:48:22PM +0300 X-Message-Flag: Your copy of Microsoft Outlook is vulnerable to viruses. See www.mutt.org for more details. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 01:48:22PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote: > Russell King writes: > > I won't even bother putting this into my bk tree and asking Linus to > > pull; I'm sure someone else will integrate this into the kernel tree > > for me. (as happened previously, and as a result I need to sort out > > my bk tree.) > > I guess testing with a bit of different hardware would be good. Oddly, that's what the rest of the community is for. Developers don't have access to all possible combinations of hardware. However, the patch to ti113x.h came from 2.4-ac, and afaik there haven't been any reports of failure there. Also note that I was just the middle man in getting the original patch applied. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html