From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.75-mm1 with contest
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 23:56:53 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307132356.53835.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
More contest results including 2.5.75-mm1 with the last iteration of my
scheduler tweaks (O4int)
no_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 1 77 94.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.74 1 79 93.7 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.74-mm1 1 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.74-mm2 1 77 96.1 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.74-mm3 1 79 93.7 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.75 1 79 93.7 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.75-mm1 1 78 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.97
2.5.74 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.5.74-mm1 1 76 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.74-mm2 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.97
2.5.74-mm3 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.5.75 1 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.75-mm1 1 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.97
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 2 108 67.6 67.0 29.6 1.40
2.5.74 2 109 67.9 65.0 28.4 1.38
2.5.74-mm1 2 106 69.8 60.0 28.3 1.34
2.5.74-mm2 2 104 71.2 55.5 26.0 1.35
2.5.74-mm3 2 107 69.2 64.0 29.0 1.35
2.5.75 2 109 68.8 64.5 28.4 1.38
2.5.75-mm1 2 93 79.6 33.0 16.1 1.19
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 3 103 74.8 0.0 0.0 1.34
2.5.74 3 104 75.0 0.0 0.0 1.32
2.5.74-mm1 3 109 72.5 1.0 5.5 1.38
2.5.74-mm2 3 111 72.1 1.0 5.4 1.44
2.5.74-mm3 3 110 72.7 1.0 6.4 1.39
2.5.75 3 112 71.4 1.0 5.4 1.42
2.5.75-mm1 3 108 74.1 1.0 6.5 1.38
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 3 113 66.4 2.0 4.4 1.47
2.5.74 3 106 72.6 1.0 3.8 1.34
2.5.74-mm1 3 123 61.8 2.0 4.8 1.56
2.5.74-mm2 3 107 71.0 1.7 4.7 1.39
2.5.74-mm3 3 105 72.4 1.0 4.8 1.33
2.5.75 3 122 63.1 2.0 4.9 1.54
2.5.75-mm1 3 105 72.4 1.3 4.8 1.35
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 4 127 59.1 39.7 16.5 1.65
2.5.74 4 331 23.9 117.5 18.7 4.19
2.5.74-mm1 4 122 63.1 44.6 19.7 1.54
2.5.74-mm2 4 163 47.2 59.9 20.1 2.12
2.5.74-mm3 4 154 50.0 55.9 20.1 1.95
2.5.75 4 119 64.7 43.8 19.3 1.51
2.5.75-mm1 4 148 52.0 52.9 18.8 1.90
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 2 112 67.9 43.0 19.6 1.45
2.5.74 2 121 64.5 50.8 22.1 1.53
2.5.74-mm1 2 118 65.3 51.2 24.6 1.49
2.5.74-mm2 2 115 67.0 46.5 22.4 1.49
2.5.74-mm3 2 117 65.8 46.4 21.4 1.48
2.5.75 2 116 67.2 48.2 20.7 1.47
2.5.75-mm1 2 99 77.8 27.9 13.9 1.27
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 2 100 76.0 7.8 7.0 1.30
2.5.74 2 104 76.0 6.6 4.8 1.32
2.5.74-mm1 2 106 74.5 8.3 6.6 1.34
2.5.74-mm2 2 103 75.7 8.2 5.8 1.34
2.5.74-mm3 2 105 74.3 8.5 6.7 1.33
2.5.75 2 106 74.5 8.3 6.6 1.34
2.5.75-mm1 2 104 76.0 8.1 5.8 1.33
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 2 93 80.6 0.0 7.5 1.21
2.5.74 2 97 79.4 0.0 7.2 1.23
2.5.74-mm1 2 94 81.9 0.0 7.4 1.19
2.5.74-mm2 2 96 80.2 0.0 7.3 1.25
2.5.74-mm3 2 95 81.1 0.0 7.4 1.20
2.5.75 2 95 81.1 0.0 7.4 1.20
2.5.75-mm1 2 96 79.2 0.0 7.3 1.23
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 2 114 68.4 54.0 1.8 1.48
2.5.74 2 97 80.4 59.5 2.0 1.23
2.5.74-mm1 2 99 79.8 51.5 2.0 1.25
2.5.74-mm2 2 102 76.5 58.5 2.0 1.32
2.5.74-mm3 2 99 79.8 59.0 2.0 1.25
2.5.75 2 98 80.6 54.0 2.0 1.24
2.5.75-mm1 2 95 83.2 52.5 2.1 1.22
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.73-mm1 4 365 20.8 5.0 48.2 4.74
2.5.74 4 334 23.1 5.0 52.7 4.23
2.5.74-mm1 4 255 30.2 5.0 42.0 3.23
2.5.74-mm2 4 386 19.9 6.5 54.9 5.01
2.5.74-mm3 4 308 25.0 4.2 49.2 3.90
2.5.75 4 366 20.8 6.0 58.5 4.63
2.5.75-mm1 4 308 24.7 4.2 49.0 3.95
This last round of tweaks designed to speed up application start up seem to
speed up compile times by penalising process_load, io_other and mem_load. The
io_load rise introduced earlier is blunted a little further but still higher
than before the tweaks began. Only process load might be a little unfair
towards the load with quite a low ratio.
Con
reply other threads:[~2003-07-13 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200307132356.53835.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).