linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lyle Seaman <lws@o-o.yi.org>
To: swsusp-devel <swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: Thoughts wanted on merging Software Suspend  enhancements
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 21:55:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030714015531.7F1CF14829@o-o.yi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>  of "Mon, 14 Jul 2003 02:43:28 BST." <20030714014328.GB22769@mail.jlokier.co.uk>


> Haven't you ever pressed the "off" or "lock" button on a computer in a
> lab and walked away?

Yes, I have, but that's not what I was driving at.  The question is, what do 
you think is the difference between :

(a) pressing "suspend" and walking away, while being assured that suspend will 
complete and leave the system ... suspended, until someone triggers a "resume"

and

(b) pressing "suspend" and walking away, while allowing the possibility that 
someone might interrupt the suspend operation.

??

Personally, I don't see any difference.




  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-14  1:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-11 22:45 Thoughts wanted on merging Software Suspend enhancements Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-12 14:00 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-12 14:55   ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-12 15:37     ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-12 19:38       ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-12 20:15         ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-12 20:22           ` [Swsusp-devel] " Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-12 22:52             ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-13  2:17               ` Jan Rychter
2003-07-12 20:20       ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-12 22:56         ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-13 13:27         ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 19:23           ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-13 19:29             ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 18:17       ` [Swsusp-devel] " Michael Frank
2003-07-13 19:29         ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-12 22:34   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2003-07-12 22:51     ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-13 13:35       ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 19:31         ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-13 21:01           ` [Swsusp-devel] " Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-13 21:09             ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-13 21:21               ` Jan Rychter
2003-07-14  1:54               ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-14  3:41                 ` Michael Frank
2003-07-14 13:11                 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-14 17:30                   ` Jan Rychter
2003-07-14 18:44                     ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-14 20:12                 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-07-14 20:18                   ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-14 20:30                     ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-14 20:43                       ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-14 21:20                         ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-14 20:41                     ` Vojtech Pavlik
     [not found]                       ` <20030714230219.GB11283@elf.ucw.cz>
2003-07-15  6:36                         ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-07-15 10:08                           ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-15 11:11                             ` Markus Gaugusch
2003-07-15 11:31                               ` Pavel Machek
     [not found]             ` <Pine.LNX.4.53.0307132305500.1090@phoenix.kerstin.at>
2003-07-14  1:15               ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14  1:26                 ` Lyle Seaman
2003-07-14  1:43                   ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14  1:55                     ` Lyle Seaman [this message]
2003-07-14  1:57                       ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-14  2:17                       ` Lyle Seaman
2003-07-14 20:10           ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-07-14 20:21             ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-14 20:29               ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-14 20:32                 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-14 20:38                   ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-15 16:23         ` Kent Borg
2003-07-15 16:27           ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-15 17:27           ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-15 19:05             ` Nigel Cunningham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030714015531.7F1CF14829@o-o.yi.org \
    --to=lws@o-o.yi.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).