From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S270036AbTGNKhS (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 14 Jul 2003 06:37:18 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270039AbTGNKhS
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 14 Jul 2003 06:37:18 -0400
Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:29312 "EHLO
	81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S270036AbTGNKhR (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 14 Jul 2003 06:37:17 -0400
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:01:24 +0100
From: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
Message-Id: <200307141101.h6EB1OxV000586@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Linux v2.6.0-test1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> The point of the test versions is to make more people realize that they
> need testing

Are all the known security issues in 2.4 now fixed in 2.6.0-test1?

This has been the only major reason for keeping of most of my
production machines running 2.4 for quite a while.  If not, can we get
the fixes in at the earliest opportunity?

John.