From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270676AbTGNQp5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:45:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270604AbTGNQnw (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:43:52 -0400 Received: from 12-226-168-214.client.attbi.com ([12.226.168.214]:15772 "EHLO marta.kurtwerks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270653AbTGNQlE (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:41:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:55:46 -0400 From: Kurt Wall To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux v2.6.0-test1 Message-ID: <20030714165546.GA11186@kurtwerks.com> References: <200307141150.h6EBoe1P000738@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200307141150.h6EBoe1P000738@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.21-krw X-Woot: Woot! Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoth John Bradford: > > Then you'll just have to wait a few months > > Oh well, it just seems strange to be asking people to test > 2.6.0-root-my-box, without making the consequences a bit clearer. And it seems equally odd actually to put an unstable kernel on a production system. Kurt -- He had occasional flashes of silence that made his conversation perfectly delightful. -- Sydney Smith