From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270711AbTGNRSw (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:18:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270688AbTGNRPy (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:15:54 -0400 Received: from supreme.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.34]:28351 "EHLO pcug.org.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270736AbTGNRLQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:11:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:25:52 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: sizeof (siginfo_t) problem Message-Id: <20030715032552.672d21ea.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20030714131400.N15481@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20030714084000.J15481@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20030715025252.17ec8d6f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20030714130024.M15481@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20030715031123.5c8e0c96.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20030714131400.N15481@devserv.devel.redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:14:01 -0400 Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > __s390x__ is defined when doing 64-bit compile targetted to s390. > Ie. gcc -m64 defines it, gcc -m31 does not. That makes sense (since I now see that CONFIG_ARCH_S390X => -m64). > Then that pad needs to be #ifdef __s390x__ as well. But why pad at all since we have now increased the size of the siginfo structure in the 64bit case (maybe I am being thick as it is 3:25am here :-)). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/