linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: what's left for 64 bit dev_t
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:19:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030716151939.1762a3cf.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030716221154.GA3051@kroah.com>

Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, to change the topic a bit, what's left to do on the 64bit dev_t
> stuff?

I don't know, really.  I've asked this of Andries several times and either
he doesn't know either, or I didn't understand the answer.

But there have been no problems with the code in -mm for a couple of months.

>  I know your tree has some support, but there was rumors that
> more was really needed to finish this off right.
> 
> Any ideas?  Thoughts?  Patches?  :)

The fact that the code has not been tested on ppc and, presumably, several
other platforms is a problem, but I guess that'll work itself out.

The situation at present is that Linus will take the patches, but I ain't
sending them because viro has expressed oblique concerns over the approach.
 I'd like to get his take on it before proceeding.  But he has vanished
again.  However I do expect that he'll get a chance to review and comment on the
changes soon.

The other concern is the unknown amount of followup work which is needed. 
All I can say there is that the kernel will continue to work in the areas
which have been exercised by testers of the -mm kernels.

I expect we'll end up just jamming it in and seeing what happens.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-16 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-16 18:46 [PATCH] print_dev_t for 2.6.0-test1-mm Greg KH
2003-07-16 20:09 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-16 21:02   ` Greg KH
2003-07-16 21:13     ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-16 21:34       ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-16 21:39         ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-16 22:10           ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-07-16 22:20           ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-16 22:21             ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-16 23:44               ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-16 23:49                 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-17  8:27                   ` Joel Becker
2003-07-17  8:47                     ` Roman Zippel
2003-07-17  9:15                       ` Joel Becker
2003-07-17  9:24                         ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-17 10:10                           ` Trond Myklebust
2003-07-17 11:46                           ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-17 11:52                         ` Alan Cox
2003-07-17 10:26                   ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-17 10:46                     ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-07-17 11:19                       ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-17 11:46                         ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-07-17 21:55                         ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-17 22:24                           ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-17 22:43                             ` Joel Becker
2003-07-17 23:11                               ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-17 23:49                                 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-07-18  0:04                                   ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-18  0:04                                 ` Joel Becker
2003-07-18  1:05                                   ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-18  8:06                                     ` Joel Becker
2003-07-17  3:00             ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]             ` <200307170300.UAA24096@cesium.transmeta.com>
2003-07-17 10:43               ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-20 14:33                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-07-16 21:36       ` Greg KH
2003-07-16 22:00         ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-16 22:11           ` what's left for 64 bit dev_t Greg KH
2003-07-16 22:19             ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2003-07-16 22:48               ` Greg KH
2003-07-17  3:02                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-07-17 13:59               ` Andries Brouwer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030716151939.1762a3cf.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).