From: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
video4linux list <video4linux-list@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] sysfs'ify video4linux
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 22:20:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030716202018.GC26510@bytesex.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030716161924.GA7406@kroah.com>
> It looks like the video drivers include a "struct video_device"
> structure within their own structures, right?
Yes, it is allocated/freed by the driver, most seem to simply include
one ore more "struct video_device" somewhere in the per-device struct.
> That will have to be changed to a pointer to that structure in order
> for the lifetime rules to work properly.
Hmm. I doubt it will be that simple. struct video_device has a priv
field which can be used by the drivers to hook in some driver-private
data. That may point into nowhere if struct video_device has a longer
live time due to some kobject still being referenced. Wouldn't be a
issue for videodev.o itself, but might become a problem for drivers
which want add private properties and rely on video_device->priv
for finding the per-device data. Problem isn't solved but justed
moved to the next corner ...
Maybe let video_unregister sleep on a semaphore which gets woken up
by the release function? That should make sure the sysfs objects are
not referenced any more if video_unregister() returns. I use a similar
method in some places when shutting down kernel threads, to make sure it
is really stopped before rmmod frees the memory.
> Look at the dev file in /sys/class/tty/*, or in /sys/block/hd* or in
> /sys/class/usb/*, and so on...
I've found the code in drivers/block/genhd.c in the meantime :)
Gerd
--
sigfault
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-16 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-15 14:31 [RFC/PATCH] sysfs'ify video4linux Gerd Knorr
2003-07-15 15:21 ` Ronald Bultje
2003-07-15 16:19 ` Matt Porter
2003-07-15 21:27 ` Greg KH
2003-07-16 8:44 ` Gerd Knorr
2003-07-16 16:19 ` Greg KH
2003-07-16 20:20 ` Gerd Knorr [this message]
2003-07-16 21:08 ` Greg KH
2003-07-17 12:01 ` Gerd Knorr
2003-07-17 14:57 ` Greg KH
2003-07-17 16:37 ` Gerd Knorr
2003-07-17 21:49 ` Greg KH
2003-07-18 9:59 ` Gerd Knorr
[not found] ` <20030718234359.GK1583@kroah.com>
2003-07-21 7:28 ` Gerd Knorr
2003-07-21 7:55 ` Ronald Bultje
2003-07-21 15:43 ` [RFC/PATCH] 1/2 v4l: sysfs'ify video4linux core Gerd Knorr
2003-07-21 15:47 ` [RFC/PATCH] 2/2 v4l: sysfs'ify bttv driver Gerd Knorr
2003-07-21 16:27 ` [RFC/PATCH] 1/2 v4l: sysfs'ify video4linux core Greg KH
2003-07-16 13:33 ` [RFC/PATCH] sysfs'ify video4linux Mark McClelland
2003-07-16 14:10 ` root
2003-07-16 16:23 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030716202018.GC26510@bytesex.org \
--to=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).