From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271417AbTGQKxm (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 06:53:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271419AbTGQKxl (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 06:53:41 -0400 Received: from ns0.eris.qinetiq.com ([128.98.1.1]:56199 "HELO mail.eris.qinetiq.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S271417AbTGQKxf (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 06:53:35 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Mark Watts Organization: QinetiQ To: Thierry Vignaud Subject: Re: devfsd/2.6.0-test1 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:07:24 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200307171017.56778.m.watts@eris.qinetiq.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200307171207.25284.m.watts@eris.qinetiq.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Mark Watts writes: > > I'm running devfs on a 2.6.0-test1 box (Mandrake 9.1 with the new > > kernel) > > > > Every time I boot, it complains that I don't have an > > /etc/modprobe.devfs. If I symlink modules.devfs, I get a wad of > > errors about 'probeall'. What should a modprobe.devfs look like for > > a 2.5/6 kernel? > > tv@vador ~ $ urpmf /etc/modprobe.devfs > module-init-tools:/etc/modprobe.devfs > Interesting, an urpmf for that on my 9.1 box reveals nothing... Thanks for the pointer... Mark. - -- Mark Watts Senior Systems Engineer QinetiQ TIM St Andrews Road, Malvern GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/FoNtBn4EFUVUIO0RAtsrAKDv8zNE7UwPttJ50cw5IFT4riRzFACfRQYy dhUB9kqE4EX3ybdcieLiEbU= =xA0b -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----