From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271725AbTGRG47 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 02:56:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271726AbTGRG47 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 02:56:59 -0400 Received: from lorien.emufarm.org ([66.93.131.57]:1410 "EHLO lorien.emufarm.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271725AbTGRG47 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 02:56:59 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 00:07:49 -0700 From: Danek Duvall To: Con Kolivas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] O6.1int Message-ID: <20030718070749.GA12466@lorien.emufarm.org> Mail-Followup-To: Danek Duvall , Con Kolivas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200307171635.25730.kernel@kolivas.org> <20030717080436.GA16509@lorien.emufarm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030717080436.GA16509@lorien.emufarm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org After fixing my nice +5 problem, I'm still seeing pretty much the same behavior, only with the priority values lowered by five. The entire desktop seems a bit snappier when not under load. I got significantly more skipping in xmms under 2.6.0-test1 than under the O6.1 patch this time, rather than the two being seemingly the same. The scrolling behavior in mozilla was pretty much identical to how I described it before. I did discover under O6.1int that I could make xmms block indefinitely when opening a window, with fvwm's wire frame manual placement, which I hadn't ever noticed before, but I'm not sure if that's because it actually wasn't there before, or I just placed the windows more quickly. So, ultimately, no real difference. Danek