From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S264448AbTGRNOx (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:14:53 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265624AbTGRNOx
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:14:53 -0400
Received: from kweetal.tue.nl ([131.155.3.6]:61964 "EHLO kweetal.tue.nl")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264448AbTGRNOw (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:14:52 -0400
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 15:29:47 +0200
From: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
       Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PATCH: typo bits
Message-ID: <20030718152947.B3019@pclin040.win.tue.nl>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0307181221390.22944-100000@vervain.sonytel.be> <1058528165.19558.3.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <1058528165.19558.3.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:36:05PM +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:36:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

> > > - * It's now support isochronous mode and more effective than hc_sl811.o
> > > + * It's now support isosynchronous mode and more effective than hc_sl811.o
> > 
> > I thought the correct term was `isochronous'...
> 
> Perhaps someone can clarify - however isochornus is definitely wrong either way

You are the native English speaker here. Isosynchronous is (was?) not an
English word.

Oh, but we aren't speaking English - this is about USB devices.
Read the USB standard and see that it has an isosynchronous mode.