From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S270287AbTGRRZb (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 18 Jul 2003 13:25:31 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270283AbTGRRZa
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 18 Jul 2003 13:25:30 -0400
Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:26497 "EHLO
	turing-police.cc.vt.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S270287AbTGRRYY (ORCPT <RFC822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 18 Jul 2003 13:24:24 -0400
Message-Id: <200307181739.h6IHdFq3006996@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4+dev
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] O6int for interactivity 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:05:05 PDT."
             <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307181004200.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com> 
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030718120229.01a8fcf0@pop.gmx.net> <5.2.1.1.2.20030718071656.01af84d0@pop.gmx.net> <200307170030.25934.kernel@kolivas.org> <200307170030.25934.kernel@kolivas.org> <5.2.1.1.2.20030718071656.01af84d0@pop.gmx.net> <5.2.1.1.2.20030718120229.01a8fcf0@pop.gmx.net> <5.2.1.1.2.20030718174433.01b12878@pop.gmx.net> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307180951050.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com>
            <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307181004200.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1852680452P";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 13:39:15 -0400
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

--==_Exmh_-1852680452P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:05:05 PDT, Davide Libenzi said:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> 
> > control them. It is right to apply uncontrolled unfairness to userspace
> > tasks though.
> 
> s/It is right/It is not right/

OK.. but is it right to apply *controlled* unfairness to userspace?


--==_Exmh_-1852680452P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQE/GDDDcC3lWbTT17ARAidfAJ4vqPd93SmVG2zT4xu2j8EOwvCJGgCeKj7H
48IBTK3QW0uWMV9Aht/XkjA=
=7G5O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-1852680452P--