From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268260AbTGTU3Q (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 16:29:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268276AbTGTU3Q (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 16:29:16 -0400 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:49099 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268260AbTGTU3P (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 16:29:15 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 04:32:54 +1000 From: Anton Blanchard To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Jakub Jelinek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Mosberger , ak@muc.de, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, matthew@wil.cx Subject: Re: sizeof (siginfo_t) problem Message-ID: <20030719183254.GE25703@krispykreme> References: <20030714084000.J15481@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20030715025252.17ec8d6f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030715025252.17ec8d6f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen, > I am not sure if the s390 fix is correct (since s390x has been merged) or > if x86_64 needs this (as I cannot remember the alignment needs of the > x86_64 compiler - though I suspect it is needed). I didnt follow this thread very carefully :) Is ppc64 broken? Anton