From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267089AbTGTNQ5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:16:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267123AbTGTNQ5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:16:57 -0400 Received: from rth.ninka.net ([216.101.162.244]:27587 "EHLO rth.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267089AbTGTNQ4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:16:56 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 06:31:37 -0700 From: "David S. Miller" To: Keith Owens Cc: ak@muc.de, linas@austin.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: KDB in the mainstream 2.4.x kernels? Message-Id: <20030720063137.3b0f2e14.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1681.1058705718@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> References: <1681.1058705718@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 22:55:18 +1000 Keith Owens wrote: > i386 provides no unwind data We could tell gcc to emit dwarf2 unwind tables on x86 for debugging kernel builds.