From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S267127AbTGTN03 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:26:29 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267134AbTGTN03
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:26:29 -0400
Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:43649 "EHLO
	81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S267127AbTGTN0Y (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:26:24 -0400
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 14:49:43 +0100
From: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
Message-Id: <200307201349.h6KDnhXj002101@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>
To: beef@nexuslabs.com, lloy0076@adam.com.au
Subject: Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, john@grabjohn.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       lkml@lrsehosting.com, lm@bitmover.com, rms@gnu.org, tytso@mit.edu,
       Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

>  * bitkeeper (because it's a better system than anything open source) vs
>    cvs wars are tedious

This discussion is nothing to do with Bit Keeper, (anymore).  We are
discussing what parts of the Hurd and GNU Mach contain code derived
from Linux.  That's actually quite interesting, and on-topic.

John.