From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267087AbTGTNQo (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:16:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267089AbTGTNQn (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:16:43 -0400 Received: from postit.adam.com.au ([203.2.124.173]:3076 "EHLO postit.adam.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267087AbTGTNQm (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:16:42 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 23:11:02 +0930 From: David Lloyd To: "Charles E. Youse" Cc: tytso@mit.edu, john@grabjohn.com, lkml@lrsehosting.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm@bitmover.com, rms@gnu.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD Message-Id: <20030720231102.7ad7bcb1.lloy0076@adam.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20030720092239.E75410-100000@treason.nexuslabs.com> References: <20030720000716.GA1085@think> <20030720092239.E75410-100000@treason.nexuslabs.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Heh, > My understanding is that theirs is a re-implementation of ext2, not a > port. Who cares about the truth? It's GNU/Linux, Linux/HURD, GATES/Linux or whatever... *sigh* These: * bitkeeper (because it's a better system than anything open source) vs cvs wars are tedious * RMS can do what he wants to do Why let the truth get in the way of, well, the truth? - -- Who now has the strength to stand against the armies of Isengard and Mordor? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Gpvumk7m2JX6ki4RAi2/AJ41g1N6uagkzF2qjzYynH8W7PO4wACgkaOP FhUeFnDJrzGWGRQRRBFx6+A= =u+ir -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----