From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269968AbTGUMTh (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2003 08:19:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269981AbTGUMTg (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2003 08:19:36 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:23777 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269968AbTGUMTe (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2003 08:19:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:33:31 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Sean Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] "blk: request botched" error on floppy write Message-ID: <20030721123331.GE10781@suse.de> References: <794001c34e24$d8f83440$7f0a0a0a@lappy7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <794001c34e24$d8f83440$7f0a0a0a@lappy7> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 19 2003, Sean wrote: > The floppy drive appears to be working for some people with the > 2.6 kernel as is. However, there have also been reports of some > problems (see http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=654 ) > > The attached patch against 2.6.0-test1 fixes the problem on all the > machines i've tested. So floppy has a problem with clustered requests? Your patch doesn't fix that bug, it masks it. Question is, if we should just accept that and move on. I mean, who really cares? -- Jens Axboe