From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269409AbTGVNTe (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:19:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270179AbTGVNTe (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:19:34 -0400 Received: from lindsey.linux-systeme.com ([80.190.48.67]:42251 "EHLO mx00.linux-systeme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269409AbTGVNTd (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:19:33 -0400 From: Marc-Christian Petersen Organization: Working Overloaded Linux Kernel To: Chris Mason , Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: 2.4.22pre6aa1 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:28:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030717102857.GA1855@dualathlon.random> <20030717225002.GY1855@dualathlon.random> <1058488216.4016.338.camel@tiny.suse.com> In-Reply-To: <1058488216.4016.338.camel@tiny.suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307221428.03791.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 18 July 2003 02:30, Chris Mason wrote: Hi Chris, > > If this doesn't help at all, it might not be an elevator/blkdev thing. > > At least on my machines the contigous I/O still at the same speed. > Especially with just one writer, you really shouldn't be able to see a > difference in pre6. Did you measure this change on both pre6 and > pre6aa1. Your message indicated that but I wanted to double check to > make sure. Yes, I measured it with pre6 and pre6aa1. There is no noticable difference. ciao, Marc