From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271364AbTGWWi2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:38:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271367AbTGWWi2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:38:28 -0400 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:21670 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271364AbTGWWi1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:38:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:53:33 +0200 From: Tomas Szepe To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test1-ac3 still broken on Adaptec I2O Message-ID: <20030723225333.GC16244@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20030723201801.GB32585@rdlg.net> <20030723212224.A527@infradead.org> <20030723220037.GC32585@rdlg.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030723220037.GC32585@rdlg.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > [Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net] > > While I'm anything but a qualified coder I'm willing to test code on > this bugger or other help where soundly possible. Would you people please stop replying above the original messages? One could say this evil (pioneered by certain silly mail clients btw) has been spreading like plague around here lately. Quoting the lkml FAQ -> (REG) And please reply after the quoted text, not before it (as per RFC 1855). It's very confusing to see a reply before the quoted context. And it's embarrassing: it makes you look like a newbie. Change your mailer if necessary, if the one you have makes it hard to do reply-after-quoting. I know some people like to quote the entire message they are replying to, so they put their reply right at the top so people won't give up after the first page of quoted material. Don't do it. It's annoying. Just learn to stop quoting everything. No-one wants to see it all anyway (list archives allow people to see everything if they missed it). You're not helping yourself anyway, as you're more likely to be ignored if you reply-before-quoting. -- Tomas Szepe