linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: arjanv@redhat.com, torvalds@transmeta.com, greg@kroah.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove module reference counting.
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 10:47:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030725104738.7ffbc118.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030725173900.D7DE12C2A9@lists.samba.org>

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 04:00:18 +1000
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:

> 	If module removal is to be a rare and unusual event, it
> doesn't seem so sensible to go to great lengths in the code to handle
> just that case.  In fact, it's easier to leave the module memory in
> place, and not have the concept of parts of the kernel text (and some
> types of kernel data) vanishing.
> 
> Polite feedback welcome,

I'm ok with this, with one possible enhancement.

How about we make ->cleanup() return a boolean, which if true
causes the caller to do the module_free()?

(Yes I know that doing this will require some more thought
 in order to minimize how large a change it would need to
 be to keep exiting modules working.  It's a seperate discussion.)

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-25 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-24 18:00 [PATCH] Remove module reference counting Rusty Russell
2003-07-25 17:47 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-07-27 18:50   ` Rusty Russell
2003-07-25 17:54 ` Greg KH
2003-07-25 19:11   ` Greg KH
2003-07-25 19:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-07-25 19:32   ` Greg KH
2003-07-25 22:26   ` Rusty Russell
2003-07-26 19:31     ` Linus Torvalds
2003-07-26 19:37       ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-07-27  5:38         ` Aschwin Marsman
2003-07-27 11:10           ` Alan Cox
2003-07-27 11:09         ` Alan Cox
2003-07-27 19:34       ` Rusty Russell
2003-07-27 21:47         ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-07-28  0:01           ` Alan Cox
2003-07-28  0:12           ` Bill Nottingham
2003-07-28 11:38             ` Alan Cox
2003-07-29 20:33               ` Rusty Russell
2003-07-30  1:55                 ` Greg KH
2003-07-30 14:40                 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-28 11:40         ` Alan Cox
2003-07-28 18:11         ` Gianni Tedesco
2003-07-28 19:03           ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-01  2:39         ` Linus Torvalds
2003-07-25 23:24   ` Alan Cox
2003-07-27 18:48     ` Rusty Russell
2003-07-25 22:43 ` Gianni Tedesco
2003-07-25 23:37   ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-07-26 20:18   ` Rusty Russell
2003-07-28 11:51 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-28 23:13   ` Rusty Russell
2003-07-29  2:39     ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-29  2:10 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030725104738.7ffbc118.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).