linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net>
To: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: 2.4 -> 2.2 differences?
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 10:24:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030725142434.GS32585@rdlg.net> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 827 bytes --]



With all the SCO fun going on I have people asking me what functionality
we would loose if we rolled from 2.4.21 kernel to the last known stable
2.2 kernel.

Yes, weathering the lawsuit mess and all is a good plan but I'm still
being asked for this information.  Does anyone have a link listing what
 kind of functionality would be lost, performance impact (p3 and athalon
machines), etc?

Robert

:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris                     | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
                                         @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu 
DISCLAIMER:
      These are MY OPINIONS ALONE.  I speak for no-one else.

Diagnosis: witzelsucht  	

IPv6 = robert@ipv6.rdlg.net	http://ipv6.rdlg.net
IPv4 = robert@mail.rdlg.net	http://www.rdlg.net

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2003-07-25 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-25 14:24 Robert L. Harris [this message]
2003-07-25 18:08 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-07-25 22:34 ` jw schultz
2003-07-25 23:29 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-07-26  0:02   ` Alan Cox
2003-07-26  0:47     ` Robert L. Harris
2003-07-26 12:36       ` Alan Cox
2003-07-26 22:49         ` Robert L. Harris
2003-07-26 15:25     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-07-28 15:00   ` Robert L. Harris
2003-07-31 19:32 ` Andrew Scott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030725142434.GS32585@rdlg.net \
    --to=robert.l.harris@rdlg.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: 2.4 -> 2.2 differences?' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).