From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: ahljoh@uni.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: directory inclusion in ext2/ext3
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 10:10:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030725171023.GL1176@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030724034833.5D63B371@mendocino>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 05:48:34AM +0200, Johannes Halmann wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 03:00:17 +0200 Mike Fedyk wrote:
> >> my idea of solving this is to have
> >> an inclusion directive in directory-files...
> >>
> >> has nobody ever felt the lack of such functionality??
>
> > What exactly does this help you to do?
> > What do you want to accomplish?
>
> hmm, i have a lot of huge files on different hard drives and wish to access
> them in a uniform fashion. i would like to sort ALL files in subdirectories
> but have no need for an LVM, RAID or similar. for example:
>
> /mnt/drive1/category1
> /mnt/drive1/category2
> /mnt/drive2/category1
> /mnt/drive2/category2
>
> (the data is so huge, that it is not possible to always merge categories on a
> single disk!)
> what i would like to do now is to be able to display all files of "cat1" and
> "cat2" respectively in "/mnt/union/category1" and "/mnt/union/category2". yet
> i don't wish to simply link the directories as this would complicate access
> with growing number of hard drives the data is spread on!
>
> it's a bit weird to explain, i hope it's understandable now :-)))
Yes, I understand a little better.
But it just looks more like a good use for LVM than before.
You don't want the redundancy of raid, and are always adding space, so LVM
should be perfect for you.
Just use a nice filesystem that resizes easily, (or even online (while
mounted, etc)), and you're set.
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-25 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-24 3:48 directory inclusion in ext2/ext3 Johannes Halmann
2003-07-25 17:10 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
[not found] <cypH.5dM.33@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cCCR.hN.7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-07-24 8:37 ` Ihar "Philips" Filipau
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-23 20:22 softpro
2003-07-24 0:54 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-07-24 1:24 ` Grant Miner
2003-07-23 19:36 softpro
2003-07-23 20:04 ` Scott McDermott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030725171023.GL1176@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=ahljoh@uni.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).