From: "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net> To: Alan Cox <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: Bernd Eckenfels <email@example.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: 2.4 -> 2.2 differences? Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:47:53 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030726004753.GA32585@rdlg.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <email@example.com> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1573 bytes --] Too bad you don't have anything they gave you or which they took back from you that could be used against them. Thus spake Alan Cox (firstname.lastname@example.org): > On Sad, 2003-07-26 at 00:29, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > > In article <20030725142434.GS32585@rdlg.net> you wrote: > > > With all the SCO fun going on I have people asking me what functionality > > > we would loose if we rolled from 2.4.21 kernel to the last known stable > > > 2.2 kernel. > > > > it is easier to turn off SMP. > > > > BTW: what will happen if there is some SMP code from IBM in the kernel which > > is owned by SCO? Isnt it a matter of days to remove that code? Does anybody > > have to pay for past usage of the code? > > The core 2.2 SMP code is stuff I wrote. Caldera (aka SCO) even provided > me the hardware and asked me to do it. The later table parser code is > from Intel. > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to email@example.com > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ :wq! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu DISCLAIMER: These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else. Diagnosis: witzelsucht IPv6 = firstname.lastname@example.org http://ipv6.rdlg.net IPv4 = email@example.com http://www.rdlg.net [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-26 0:32 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-07-25 14:24 Robert L. Harris 2003-07-25 18:08 ` Mike Fedyk 2003-07-25 22:34 ` jw schultz 2003-07-25 23:29 ` Bernd Eckenfels 2003-07-26 0:02 ` Alan Cox 2003-07-26 0:47 ` Robert L. Harris [this message] 2003-07-26 12:36 ` Alan Cox 2003-07-26 22:49 ` Robert L. Harris 2003-07-26 15:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2003-07-28 15:00 ` Robert L. Harris 2003-07-31 19:32 ` Andrew Scott
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030726004753.GA32585@rdlg.net \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --subject='Re: 2.4 -> 2.2 differences?' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).