linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
	netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.4 patch] netfilter Configure.help cleanup
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 12:50:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030726105021.GH22218@fs.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030725205024.GA3244@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org>

On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 10:50:24PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 11:06:49AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > In message <20030717201304.GL1407@fs.tum.de> you write:
> >
> > > the patch below does the following changes to the netfilter entries in
> > > Configure.help in 2.4.22-pre2:
> > > - order similar to net/ipv4/netfilter/Config.in
> > > - remove useless short descriptions above CONFIG_*
> > > - added CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_RECENT entry (stolen from 2.5)
> > 
> > Sorry Adrian, I think this is overzealous.
> > 
> > Please just add the CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_RECENT entry.  Remember,
> > "stable" means "boring". 8)
> 
> I will submit the RECENT entry to davem with my next set of patches.
> 
> Does everybody else have an ordered Configure.help?  if yes, I'd accept

Most subsytems have their Configure.help entries ordered according to 
the Config.in order.

> the patch to comply with common practice.  If not, I would just say: who
> cares about the order, it's processed by {old,menu,x}config anyway.

I'm not religious regarding the order of Configure.help entries, and in 
2.6 this problem will be non-existant.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-26 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-27 23:33 Adrian Bunk
2003-06-30  4:38 ` Rusty Russell
2003-07-02 19:25   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-17 20:13     ` Adrian Bunk
2003-07-17 20:19       ` David S. Miller
2003-07-18  1:06       ` Rusty Russell
2003-07-25 20:50         ` Harald Welte
2003-07-26 10:50           ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2003-07-17 20:11   ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030726105021.GH22218@fs.tum.de \
    --to=bunk@fs.tum.de \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --subject='Re: [2.4 patch] netfilter Configure.help cleanup' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).