From: "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki-lkm@lina.inka.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4 -> 2.2 differences?
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 18:49:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030726224937.GA6982@rdlg.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1059223010.1879.6.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 885 bytes --]
Yeah but likely nothing along the line of correspondence of them
offering you the stuff if you give them a copy of your work on SMP which
would happen to be GPL'd....
Thus spake Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk):
> On Sad, 2003-07-26 at 01:47, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> > Too bad you don't have anything they gave you or which they took back
> > from you that could be used against them.
>
> Its a matter of archived public record since long ago
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
@ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
Diagnosis: witzelsucht
IPv6 = robert@ipv6.rdlg.net http://ipv6.rdlg.net
IPv4 = robert@mail.rdlg.net http://www.rdlg.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-26 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-25 14:24 2.4 -> 2.2 differences? Robert L. Harris
2003-07-25 18:08 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-07-25 22:34 ` jw schultz
2003-07-25 23:29 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-07-26 0:02 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-26 0:47 ` Robert L. Harris
2003-07-26 12:36 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-26 22:49 ` Robert L. Harris [this message]
2003-07-26 15:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-07-28 15:00 ` Robert L. Harris
2003-07-31 19:32 ` Andrew Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030726224937.GA6982@rdlg.net \
--to=robert.l.harris@rdlg.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ecki-lkm@lina.inka.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).