From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270637AbTG0AP6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2003 20:15:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270638AbTG0AP6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2003 20:15:58 -0400 Received: from [216.208.38.106] ([216.208.38.106]:29938 "EHLO uml.karaya.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270637AbTG0AP5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2003 20:15:57 -0400 Message-Id: <200307270034.h6R0YbG8010438@uml.karaya.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Henrik Nordstrom cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0-test1 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 26 Jul 2003 23:57:08 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 20:34:37 -0400 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org hno@marasystems.com said: > As usable as the 2.4 (barring generic kernel issues) Generally, yes, but... > or is there areas > still neeed to be looked into for the UML port to 2.6? ... I've fallen behind on some areas, like modules hugetlbfs networking doesn't work for some reason vsyscalls and sysenter and probably a few other things which aren't coming to mind > Any news on the possibility of having more of UML merged into the 2.6 > tree? Linus isn't taking my patches. I'll give him one more try, then see if I can get them in through akpm. Jeff