From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270680AbTG0GIK (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 02:08:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270681AbTG0GIK (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 02:08:10 -0400 Received: from hueytecuilhuitl.mtu.ru ([195.34.32.123]:46095 "EHLO hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270680AbTG0GIJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 02:08:09 -0400 From: Andrey Borzenkov To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6 - sysfs sensor nameing inconsistency Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 10:23:13 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: margitsw@t-online.de (Margit Schubert-While) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307271023.15304.arvidjaar@mail.ru> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Attached is patch against 2.6.0-test1 that adds type_name to all in-tree >> sensors; it sets it to the same values as corr. 2.4 senors and (in one case) >> changes client name to match that of 2.4. > > Well, it certainly doesn't with the lm85.c :-) > Hint - names are in lib/chips.h in sensors package :-) It was my fault I should not start changing names, sorry. Sometimes this happens. If this patch is accepted it is OK though, we may change other names to be more user-friendly as well. -andrey Please Cc me I am not on lkml