linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL] kill surplus menu in IDE Kconfig
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:39:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030727123947.GC24002@louise.pinerecords.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307271425140.717-100000@serv>

> [zippel@linux-m68k.org]
> 
> > Patch against -bk3.
> 
> Moving up BLK_DEV_HD_ONLY like this is probably not a good idea, it makes 
> everything a submenu of this, what might be confusing.

It's logical though. :)

> Try the patch below instead, it fixes the menu structure, everything which 
> requires BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI is now also under that menu.

Your patch seems to be against test1 vanilla -- it doesn't apply to -bk3.

> +menuconfig IDE

How exactly does menuconfig work, anyway?

It's not a "block command" -> how will kconf know which entries to put
in the submenu?

What if I have

	menuconfig FOO
		bool "foo"

	menuconfig BAR
		bool "bar"

	config BAZ
		bool "baz"
		depends on FOO && BAR

Where is BAZ going to show up and why?

-- 
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-27 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-26 20:00 [TRIVIAL] kill surplus menu in IDE Kconfig Tomas Szepe
2003-07-27  2:39 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-07-27 11:01 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-27 11:25   ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-27 11:28     ` Alan Cox
2003-07-27 11:42       ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-27 12:29 ` Roman Zippel
2003-07-27 12:39   ` Tomas Szepe [this message]
2003-07-27 13:31     ` Roman Zippel
2003-07-29 17:24       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-30  5:57         ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-30 16:30           ` [PATCH] " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-30 22:27             ` Roman Zippel
2003-07-31  9:03             ` Tomas Szepe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030727123947.GC24002@louise.pinerecords.com \
    --to=szepe@pinerecords.com \
    --cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).