From: Andrew de Quincey <adq_dvb@lidskialf.net>
To: Rahul Karnik <rahul@genebrew.com>
Cc: Marcelo Penna Guerra <eu@marcelopenna.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Laurens <masterpe@xs4all.nl>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvidia nforce 1.0-261 nvnet for kernel 2.5
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 12:46:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307271246.38338.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F23BC1D.7070804@genebrew.com>
On Sunday 27 July 2003 12:48, Rahul Karnik wrote:
> Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> > Ah, so THATS who they licensed it from. I didn't think nividia would go
> > to the bother of designing their own ethernet hardware.
>
> Actually, this is not certain, but it is one of the guesses. So far,
> Nforce2 = AMD IDE + Intel sound + <unknown> ethernet.
It certainly loads "better" than the VIA drivers; I'd already tried hacking
the PCI IDs into them.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-27 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-26 22:09 [PATCH] nvidia nforce 1.0-261 nvnet for kernel 2.5 Andrew de Quincey
2003-07-27 4:50 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 4:56 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 2:26 ` Marcelo Penna Guerra
2003-07-27 5:59 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 9:16 ` Laurens
2003-07-27 10:37 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 11:19 ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-07-27 11:22 ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-07-27 11:48 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 11:46 ` Andrew de Quincey [this message]
2003-07-27 12:02 ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-07-27 13:36 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 14:01 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 14:14 ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-07-27 14:44 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 15:46 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-27 16:28 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 19:51 ` Laurens
2003-07-28 1:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-27 23:11 ` Marcelo Penna Guerra
2003-07-28 8:53 ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-07-27 5:53 ` Brian Jackson
2003-07-29 8:44 Eric
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200307271246.38338.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net \
--to=adq_dvb@lidskialf.net \
--cc=eu@marcelopenna.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masterpe@xs4all.nl \
--cc=rahul@genebrew.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).