From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272754AbTG1JO0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 05:14:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272758AbTG1JO0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 05:14:26 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.iol.cz ([194.228.2.87]:62635 "EHLO smtp-out2.iol.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272754AbTG1JOZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 05:14:25 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:29:22 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Marcelo Tosatti , cb-lkml@fish.zetnet.co.uk Cc: Pavel Machek , jimis@gmx.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Feature proposal (scheduling related) Message-ID: <20030728092922.GB233@elf.ucw.cz> References: <3F1E6A25.5030308@gmx.net> <20030723114322.GD729@zaurus.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > > With the current scheduler we can prioritize the CPU usage for each > > > process. What I think would be extremely useful (as I have needed it > > > many times) is the scheduling of disk I/O and net I/O traffic. 2 > > > examples showing the importance (the numbers are estimations just to > > > explain whati I mean): > > > > Yes that would be nice, and in 2.5 timeframe > > there was patch doing that. Port it to 2.6 an test it! > > Do you remember who wrote those or where one can find it? After a bit of searching I found this. I'm not 100% sure this is the same one I am remembering, but it looks like that. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103962160319984&w=2 [No, I'm probably remembering some other patch, this looks way too simple, but may be good point to start...] Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]