From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272674AbTG1Gpp (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 02:45:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272678AbTG1Gpp (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 02:45:45 -0400 Received: from c210-49-248-224.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:45217 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272674AbTG1Gpn (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 02:45:43 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: Mike Galbraith , Felipe Alfaro Solana Subject: Re: [patch] sched-2.6.0-test1-G6, interactivity changes Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:05:01 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: Ingo Molnar , LKML References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030728065857.01bc9708@pop.gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20030728065857.01bc9708@pop.gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307281705.01471.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:04, Mike Galbraith wrote: > to recharge his sleep_avg. He stays low priority. Kobiashi-maru: X can't > Conclusion accuracy/inaccuracy aside, I'd like to see if anyone else can > reproduce that second scenario. Yes I can reproduce it, but we need the Kirk approach and cheat. Some workaround for tasks that have fallen onto the expired array but shouldn't be there needs to be created. But first we need to think of one before we can create one... Con