From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270256AbTG1Qk2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:40:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270271AbTG1Qk2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:40:28 -0400 Received: from hueytecuilhuitl.mtu.ru ([195.34.32.123]:2322 "EHLO hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270256AbTG1Qk1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:40:27 -0400 From: Andrey Borzenkov To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.6: irtty vs. irtty-sir Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 20:31:09 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: irda-users@lists.sourceforge.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307282031.09714.arvidjaar@mail.ru> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org irtty is dabbed as broken in Makefile. Question - is it fundamentally broken, sometimes broken or under special conditions broken? :) I need to decide if I replace default ldisc-11 by irtty-sir in 2.6 (risking that some dongles stop working for some people) or leave it as irtty and tell guys who build kernel to use CONFIG_IRTTY_OLD TIA -andrey