From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272759AbTG3Flr (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:41:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272763AbTG3Flr (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:41:47 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:41415 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272759AbTG3Flq (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:41:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:38:02 -0700 From: "David S. Miller" To: Tomas Szepe Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL] place IPv4 netfilter submenu where it belongs Message-Id: <20030729223802.1d670476.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20030729042618.GL32673@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20030726200646.GF16160@louise.pinerecords.com> <20030727160942.647707d8.davem@redhat.com> <20030729042618.GL32673@louise.pinerecords.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.2 (GTK+ 1.2.6; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 06:26:18 +0200 Tomas Szepe wrote: > Ok, what does this look like? > > The only aim of the patch is to put most netfilter options > in a dedicated submenu so that one can go tweaking the > them right where they've enabled netfilter in the first > place. This looks fine to me. Can I get an ACK from the netfilter folks? Thanks.