From: Bernardo Innocenti <bernie@develer.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
uClinux development list <uclinux-dev@uclinux.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] Kernel 2.6 size increase
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 04:49:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307300449.37692.bernie@develer.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030729222921.GK16051@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net>
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 00:29, Tom Rini wrote:
> > Some of the bigger 2.6 additions cannot be configured out.
> > I wish sysfs and the different I/O schedulers could be removed.
> >
> > There are probably many other things mostly useless for embedded
> > systems that I'm not aware of.
>
> Well, from Pat's talk at OLS, it seems like sysfs would be an important
> part of 'sleep', which is something at least some embedded systems care
> about.
I tried stripping sysfs away. I just saved 7KB and got a kernel that
couldn't boot because root device translation depends on sysfs ;-)
> ... not that 2.6 doesn't need some good pruning options now, but maybe
> CONFIG_EMBEDDED isn't the right place to put them all.
In the long term the embedded menu would get cluttered with all kinds
of disparate options... I don't think I would like it.
--
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/ http://www.develer.com/
Please don't send Word attachments - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-30 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-23 18:46 Kernel 2.6 size increase Bernardo Innocenti
2003-07-23 19:14 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-07-23 20:07 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 21:47 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-07-23 19:32 ` [uClinux-dev] " Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-23 20:11 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 20:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-23 20:22 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 20:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-23 22:35 ` [uClinux-dev] Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()? Bernardo Innocenti
2003-07-23 22:37 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-23 23:00 ` Bernardo Innocenti
2003-07-24 5:06 ` David McCullough
2003-07-24 11:28 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-24 12:04 ` David McCullough
2003-07-24 14:48 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-25 18:25 ` bill davidsen
2003-07-24 15:30 ` Hollis Blanchard
2003-07-24 19:37 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-24 19:51 ` Hollis Blanchard
2003-07-24 21:20 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-07-25 4:22 ` Otto Solares
2003-07-25 14:38 ` Hollis Blanchard
2003-07-28 3:19 ` Miles Bader
2003-07-28 8:14 ` Ihar "Philips" Filipau
2003-07-28 8:58 ` Miles Bader
2003-07-28 9:03 ` Ihar "Philips" Filipau
2003-07-23 21:57 ` [uClinux-dev] Kernel 2.6 size increase Bernardo Innocenti
2003-07-23 22:07 ` Bernardo Innocenti
2003-07-23 22:27 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-07-23 22:34 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-24 20:27 ` Bernardo Innocenti
2003-07-25 15:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-25 23:55 ` [PATCH] Make I/O schedulers optional (Was: Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase) Bernardo Innocenti
2003-07-26 8:17 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-26 12:40 ` Bernardo Innocenti
2003-07-26 14:07 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-26 23:42 ` Bernardo Innocenti
2003-07-26 23:41 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-28 17:13 ` [uClinux-dev] Kernel 2.6 size increase Nicolas Pitre
2003-07-28 23:02 ` Bernardo Innocenti
2003-07-29 2:36 ` Miles Bader
2003-08-08 13:25 ` [uClinux-dev] " David Woodhouse
2003-08-08 14:37 ` Bernardo Innocenti
2003-08-08 14:43 ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-25 18:16 ` bill davidsen
2003-07-29 22:29 ` Tom Rini
2003-07-29 22:48 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-29 23:06 ` Tom Rini
2003-07-30 2:07 ` Miles Bader
2003-07-30 15:33 ` Tom Rini
2003-07-31 1:49 ` Miles Bader
2003-07-31 4:17 ` Tom Rini
2003-07-31 5:03 ` Miles Bader
2003-07-31 15:24 ` Tom Rini
2003-07-30 2:49 ` Bernardo Innocenti [this message]
2003-07-30 15:35 ` [uClinux-dev] " Tom Rini
2003-07-30 16:45 ` [uClinux-dev] Kernel 2.6 size increase (PATCH) Bernardo Innocenti
2003-07-25 20:42 [uClinux-dev] Kernel 2.6 size increase John Bradford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200307300449.37692.bernie@develer.com \
--to=bernie@develer.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=uclinux-dev@uclinux.org \
--cc=willy@w.ods.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).