Re: [PATCH] O11int for interactivity

[Eugene Teo <eugene.teo@eugeneteo.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1806 bytes --]

[~] $ uname -a
Linux amaryllis 2.6.0-test2-mm1-kj1+O11.1int #1 Wed Jul 30 18:57:37 SGT
2003 i686 GNU/Linux

Applied mm1, kj1 (kernel-janitor), and your O11.1int patch.

when X is niced with -10, there are a 1-2 sec pause whenever I switched
from X to console.

when X is niced with 0, there are no skips, no pause, no whatsoever.
even when I maximise aterm, there are no interruptions on my xmms when
i hide, and unhide aterm. nothing unusual when i compile kernels. 

this is perhaps the best patch i ever applied from you.

Cheers,
Eugene

<quote sender="Con Kolivas">
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:31, Voluspa wrote:
> > On 2003-07-30 8:41:46 Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> > > Wops! Wait a minute! O11.1 is great, but I've had a few XMMS skips
> > > that I didn't have with O10. They're really difficult to reproduce,
> >
> > Can't reproduce your skips here with my light environment and O11.1 (on
> > a PII 400, 128 meg mem, no desktop, Enlightenment as wm). Even as I
> > write this my machine is under the most extreme load that I have -
> > natural, not artificial:
> 
> Good test. Thanks.
> 
> > As to difference between O10 and O11.1 in feel... No comment. I'm too
> > old to catch such small variations.
> 
> That's good, most of the difference was supposed to be in extremely unusual 
> circumstances. Felipe's issue is something I was concerned might happen (not 
> specifically an audio issue per se but audio is a sensitive way to pick it 
> up) which is why all testing is important.
> 
> Con
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]