From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262123AbTG3Jub (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 05:50:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267517AbTG3Jub (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 05:50:31 -0400 Received: from lindsey.linux-systeme.com ([80.190.48.67]:34575 "EHLO mx00.linux-systeme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262123AbTG3Jub (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 05:50:31 -0400 From: Marc-Christian Petersen Organization: Working Overloaded Linux Kernel To: Con Kolivas Subject: Re: [PATCH] O11int for interactivity Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:45:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: Felipe Alfaro Solana , linux kernel mailing list , Andrew Morton References: <200307301038.49869.kernel@kolivas.org> <200307301040.38858.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> <1059557903.3f27920f97d4a@kolivas.org> In-Reply-To: <1059557903.3f27920f97d4a@kolivas.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307301145.45929.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 30 July 2003 11:38, Con Kolivas wrote: Hi Con, > > Maybe we need both: VM fixups (we need them anyway!) and O(1) fixups so > > that also my machine will be happy ;) > The obvious question still needs to be asked here. How does vanilla compare > to vanilla +O11.1? Sorry, haven't had the time this night to test that also. I was a bit sad ;) I'll report vanilla+O11.1int at friday. I don't have time earlier. ciao, Marc