From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272423AbTGaHPx (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:15:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272430AbTGaHPx (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:15:53 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:49312 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272423AbTGaHPw (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:15:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:16:18 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Stefano Rivoir Cc: lista1@telia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Disk performance degradation Message-Id: <20030731001618.757ab293.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <3F28BE65.9060809@gts.it> References: <20030729182138.76ff2d96.lista1@telia.com> <3F2786E9.9010808@gts.it> <20030730035524.65cfc39a.akpm@osdl.org> <3F27ECFA.5020005@gts.it> <20030730114428.7e629895.akpm@osdl.org> <3F28BE65.9060809@gts.it> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stefano Rivoir wrote: > > > How much more memory is X using when DRI is loaded? > > Here attached you'll find the vmstats, 2.4.21, 2.6.0 with DRI and 2.6.0 > w/o DRI. 2.4.21 and 2.6.0-nodri are more or less the same... wow, it seems to have taken 24 megabytes. You may get nicer performance out of that little machine by decreasing /proc/sys/vm/swappiness. I have the feeling that the current default of 60% is about right for 256M machines, but too small for larger machines, too large for smaller machines. I use 85% on a 1G desktop machine.