linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:11:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030731061113.GL1873@lug-owl.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030730221925.GA2858@werewolf.able.es>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1444 bytes --]

On Thu, 2003-07-31 00:19:25 +0200, J.A. Magallon <jamagallon@able.es>
wrote in message <20030730221925.GA2858@werewolf.able.es>:
> On 07.30, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> [...]
> > ...and IFF those new opcodes bring _that_ much performance, then we
> > should think about another Debian distribution for i686-linux. Up to
> > now, I was really proud of having _one_ distribution that's basically
> > capable of running on all and any machines I own...
> 
> Do as Mandrake (and I suppose another distros), and put optimized libraries
> in /lib/i686, /lib/mmx, /lib/sse, /usr/lib/i686, etc. New ld.so supports
> mapping different versions of library depending on arch.

I know. ...and this won't work. Think about this:

	- Some lib links (statically) some parts of libstdc++5.a. This
	  is done on a i386.
	- Some app (compiled for i486 on some other box) links against
	  the above lib (which was copied over).

Now, you've got two ways to access your atomic variables. Do that
multithreaded, and you'll boom.

It's all about "eventually" and "possibly", but you break binary
compatibility at some point.

MfG, JBG

-- 
   Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481
   "Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
    fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!
      ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(IRAQ_WAR_2 | DRM | TCPA));

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-31  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-30 13:56 TSCs are a no-no on i386 Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-07-30 14:18 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-07-30 14:44   ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-07-30 16:58 ` Matthew Garrett
2003-07-30 17:19   ` Alan Cox
2003-07-30 18:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-07-30 18:30   ` Mike Fedyk
2003-07-30 18:45     ` Adrian Bunk
2003-07-30 20:01       ` Alan Cox
2003-07-30 20:33         ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-07-30 22:19           ` J.A. Magallon
2003-07-31  6:11             ` Jan-Benedict Glaw [this message]
2003-07-30 23:05           ` Alan Cox
2003-07-31 11:11             ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-07-31 11:26               ` Emulating i486+ insn on i386 (was: TSCs are a no-no on i386) Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-07-31 11:41             ` TSCs are a no-no on i386 Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-07-31  0:22           ` Adrian Bunk
2003-07-31  6:22             ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-07-31  7:17               ` Willy Tarreau
2003-07-31 11:38                 ` Emulating i486 on i386 (was: TSCs are a no-no on i386) Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-07-31 11:51                   ` Alan Cox
2003-07-31 12:14                     ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-07-31 13:01                       ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-07-31 15:09                         ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-07-31 15:33                           ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-08-01  5:37                             ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-07-31 15:12                     ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-31 15:32                       ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-07-31 15:07                 ` TSCs are a no-no on i386 Jamie Lokier
2003-07-31 15:23                   ` Willy Tarreau
2003-07-31 15:50                   ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-07-31 16:24                     ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-08-06 11:08         ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-06 14:33           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-07-30 20:28       ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-07-30 21:50         ` Petr Vandrovec
2003-07-30 23:10           ` Alan Cox
2003-07-31 15:10             ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-31 16:01               ` Alan Cox
2003-07-31 18:37                 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-31 19:10                   ` Alan Cox
2003-07-31  6:29           ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-07-30 20:27   ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-08-06 16:41 James Bottomley
2003-08-06 16:45 James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030731061113.GL1873@lug-owl.de \
    --to=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).