From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272556AbTGaRUt (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:20:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272564AbTGaRUt (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:20:49 -0400 Received: from fed1mtao02.cox.net ([68.6.19.243]:55730 "EHLO fed1mtao02.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272556AbTGaRUs (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:20:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:20:46 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Ihar Philips Filipau Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase Message-ID: <20030731172046.GH27214@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> References: <3F294461.2020902@softhome.net> <20030731164326.GG27214@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> <3F294C31.6030702@softhome.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F294C31.6030702@softhome.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 07:04:49PM +0200, Ihar Philips Filipau wrote: > Tom Rini wrote: > > > >Shutdown != sleep. If you want to wake devices up again, you need to do > >them in the right order. > > You didn't get my point. > My appliances do not need sleep/shutdown at all. > Not every embedded system is a handheld ;-) That certainly is true, yes. They might want to power things down when the user isn't there (or maybe they don't, I don't know what you're making :)). And I did originally say 'some'. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/