From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270696AbTHAJKN (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2003 05:10:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270697AbTHAJKN (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2003 05:10:13 -0400 Received: from dsl092-053-140.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.53.140]:26522 "EHLO grelber.thyrsus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270696AbTHAJKK (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2003 05:10:10 -0400 From: Rob Landley Reply-To: rob@landley.net To: John Bradford Subject: Re: Messing with Kconfig. Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 05:12:28 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, szepe@pinerecords.com References: <200308010901.h7191Wsd000946@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200308010901.h7191Wsd000946@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308010512.28479.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 01 August 2003 05:01, John Bradford wrote: > > So I'm looking at menuconfig and contemplating rearranging the heck out > > of it > > Please don't. This comes up from time to time on the mailing list, > and massive re-arrangements are usually a Bad Thing. > > John. I know a big flag day rearrangement would never be accepted. It would have to be a series of small, self-contained patches that could be individually approved or vetoed. (And several of them will be vetoed, this is normal.) I know the drill. You get there from here in quarter-inch steps... Rob