From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271389AbTHDMKp (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 08:10:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271707AbTHDMKp (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 08:10:45 -0400 Received: from uni03du.unity.ncsu.edu ([152.1.13.103]:11904 "EHLO uni03du.unity.ncsu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271389AbTHDMKo (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 08:10:44 -0400 From: jlnance@unity.ncsu.edu Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 08:10:43 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test2-mm3 Message-ID: <20030804121043.GA1269@ncsu.edu> References: <20030802152202.7d5a6ad1.akpm@osdl.org> <20030802223140.GA25501@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20030802164205.5cc42edc.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030802164205.5cc42edc.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:42:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Bolting 64G of memory onto a 32-bit CPU is tasteless too... > > We already have a bucketload of highmem hacks in the kernel, and they are > not sufficient for some people. We have several more (large) highmem hacks > being proposed. Do you see us removing the other highmem hacks if we add the 4G/4G patch? Thanks, Jim