linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FS: hardlinks on directories
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:32:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030804153236.5748ba38.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16174.21970.527300.160659@laputa.namesys.com>

On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:47:14 +0400
Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM> wrote:

> Hard links on directories are hard to do in the UNIX file system model.
> 
> Where ".." should point? How to implement rmdir? You can think about
> UNIX unlink as some form of reference counter based garbage
> collector---when last (persistent) reference to the object is removed it
> is safe to recycle it. It is well-known that reference counting GC
> cannot cope with cyclical references. Usually this is not a problem for
> the file system because all cyclical references are very well
> known---they always involve "." and "..". But as one allows hard links
> on directories, file system is no longer tree, but generic directed
> graph and reference counting GC wouldn't work.

If file-/directory-nodes are single-linked list nodes inside one directory, and
directory-nodes pointing to the same directory are single-linked list nodes,
you can:

- ".." do as first node of a directory and the "shared" part of the directory
follows on its next-pointer, so you have one ".." for every hard-link.
- implement rmdir as throw-away dir-node and ".." node and only if pointer to
next hw-linked directory-node is itself remove rest of linked node list

Are there further questionable operations?

Regards,
Stephan



  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-04 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-04 12:15 FS: hardlinks on directories Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 12:45 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-08-04 13:22   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 13:37     ` Christian Reichert
2003-08-04 13:44       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 14:22         ` Christian Reichert
2003-08-04 15:31     ` Jeff Muizelaar
2003-08-04 16:15       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05  2:45         ` Neil Brown
2003-08-05  9:41           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-06  1:12             ` Neil Brown
2003-08-06 10:14               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-07  2:27                 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-04 12:47 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-08-04 13:32   ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2003-08-04 13:44 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-04 13:56   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 14:04     ` Anton Altaparmakov
2003-08-04 14:50       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 20:03         ` Olivier Galibert
2003-08-04 21:16         ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 23:34           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 14:20             ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05 14:44               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 22:58         ` Andrew Pimlott
2003-08-05  0:19           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05  1:18             ` Andrew Pimlott
2003-08-05  8:04               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 11:18                 ` Wakko Warner
2003-08-04 14:33     ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 15:05       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 15:57         ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-08-04 21:23           ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 16:11         ` Adam Sampson
2003-08-04 17:00         ` Hans Reiser
2003-08-04 17:18           ` Sean Neakums
2003-08-05  4:53           ` jw schultz
2003-08-04 18:50         ` jlnance
2003-08-04 21:09         ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 22:13           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 22:32           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 23:00             ` Randolph Bentson
2003-08-05  0:10               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05  2:09                 ` Edgar Toernig
2003-08-05  8:05                   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 12:51             ` Helge Hafting
2003-08-05 13:03               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 13:13                 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2003-08-05 13:39                   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 13:36                 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-08-05 14:04                   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 14:57                     ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-08-05 15:08                       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 15:02                     ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05 15:12                       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 15:44                       ` Trond Myklebust
2003-08-05 14:56                   ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05 22:08                 ` Helge Hafting
2003-08-24 17:35                   ` Hans Reiser
2003-08-24 19:02                     ` Helge Hafting
2003-08-25  8:27                     ` Nikita Danilov
2003-08-25 15:48                       ` Hans Reiser
2003-08-05 14:12             ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05 14:21               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 15:53                 ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-08-04 20:47     ` Jan Harkes
2003-08-04 15:42   ` Brian Pawlowski
2003-08-04 15:56     ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 16:16       ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-08-04 16:35         ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 16:54           ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-08-04 17:18             ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 17:25               ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-08-04 21:38           ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05  0:06             ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05  3:11           ` Neil Brown
2003-08-04 21:29       ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 23:42         ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 16:46           ` viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030804153236.5748ba38.skraw@ithnet.com \
    --to=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=Nikita@Namesys.COM \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).