linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lk maintainers
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:52:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030805135226.GA23566@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200308051226.h75CQVj19345@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 553 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:36:03PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> This document is mailed to lkml regularly and will be modified
> whenever new victim wishes to be listed in it or someone can
> no longer devote his time to maintainer work.
> 
Isn't this exactly what MAINTAINERS is for? What is the point of
having this lk-maintainers list if MAINTAINERS is supposed to be
authoritative?

It seems like this adds more confusion then anything else, since
now it's not obvious what should be considered the defacto standard
maintainer list.


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-08-05 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-05 12:36 lk maintainers Denis Vlasenko
2003-08-05 12:53 ` Con Kolivas
2003-08-05 13:52 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2003-08-05 15:02 ` kbuild (was Re: lk maintainers) Matt Mackall
2003-08-05 22:37 ` lk maintainers Dave Olien
2003-08-06 17:18 ` Dave Jones
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-28  8:51 Denis Vlasenko
2003-06-24  6:57 Denis Vlasenko
2003-06-13  8:21 Denis Vlasenko
2003-06-05 10:52 Denis Vlasenko
2003-05-29  5:53 Denis Vlasenko
2003-05-20  8:22 Denis Vlasenko
2003-05-20  8:54 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-05-20 10:58 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2003-05-20 11:42   ` Alan Cox
2003-05-20 12:16   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-04-17  6:28 Denis Vlasenko
2003-04-03 12:52 Denis Vlasenko
2003-04-03 19:49 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-03-12 13:12 Denis Vlasenko
2003-02-27 12:07 Denis Vlasenko
2003-02-12  7:38 Denis Vlasenko
2003-02-05  6:47 Denis Vlasenko
     [not found] ` <20030205125552.GA23472@fatbob.nu>
2003-02-06  6:17   ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-02-06  7:09     ` Brian Davids
2003-02-06 15:22     ` Horst von Brand
2003-01-09  8:54 Denis Vlasenko
2003-01-09  8:51 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-01-09  9:57   ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-25 13:35 Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-17 11:17 Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-17 23:55 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-12-18 10:49   ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-18  7:29     ` Andre Hedrick
2002-12-18  7:29     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-12-18 13:24       ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-18 15:13         ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-09 15:33 Denis Vlasenko
2002-11-27 19:31 Denis Vlasenko
2002-11-27 17:54 ` James Simmons
2002-11-13 13:06 Denis Vlasenko
2002-11-13 17:12 ` James Simmons
2002-10-16 10:12 Denis Vlasenko
2002-10-18 16:34 ` James Simmons
2002-10-10 10:07 Denis Vlasenko
2002-10-10 17:28 ` Ingo Oeser
2002-10-01 14:30 Denis Vlasenko
2002-10-01 17:23 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-10-03  1:05   ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-10-02 22:26     ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-10-03 10:30     ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-24 12:34 Denis Vlasenko
2002-09-12 22:50 Denis Vlasenko
2002-08-19 22:07 Denis Vlasenko
2002-08-09 13:36 Denis Vlasenko
2002-07-29 21:36 Denis Vlasenko
2002-07-02 11:34 Denis Vlasenko
2002-06-26 10:20 Denis Vlasenko
2002-06-07 15:26 Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-15 15:40 Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-02 15:25 Denis Vlasenko
2002-04-23 16:22 Denis Vlasenko
2002-04-09 13:35 Denis Vlasenko
2002-04-01 22:50 Denis Vlasenko
2002-03-26 16:58 Denis Vlasenko
2002-03-19 14:04 Denis Vlasenko
2002-03-11 18:01 Denis Vlasenko
2002-03-02 16:24 Denis Vlasenko
     [not found] <200202150943.g1F9hht26143@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
2002-02-15 14:25 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-02-14 13:37 Denis Vlasenko
2002-02-14 20:35 ` Hans-Joachim Baader
2002-02-15 11:00   ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-02-15  9:11     ` Thomas Capricelli
2002-02-15 13:25       ` Denis Vlasenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030805135226.GA23566@linux-sh.org \
    --to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).