From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266985AbTHER1k (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:27:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267471AbTHER1k (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:27:40 -0400 Received: from bristol.phunnypharm.org ([65.207.35.130]:47341 "EHLO bristol.phunnypharm.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266985AbTHER1j (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:27:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:26:19 -0400 From: Ben Collins To: Larry McVoy , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: BK2CVS problem (fixed) Message-ID: <20030805172619.GL500@phunnypharm.org> References: <20030805154131.GA20234@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030805154131.GA20234@work.bitmover.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:41:31AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote: > Several people pointed out problems in the BK2CVS trees. I spent this > morning checking things over and there were indeed some out of date files. > I've fixed those up and put in place validation tools which should ensure > that this does not happen again. Does this only affect 2.5, and do I need to make bkcvs2svn rebuild from scratch? -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/