From: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
To: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, torvalds@osdl.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make modules work in Linus' tree on ARM
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:16:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308141716.h7EHGfqg000643@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> (raw)
> > After reviewing the /proc/kcore and kclist issues, I've decided that I'm
> > no longer prepared to even _think_ about supporting /proc/kcore on ARM -
>
> I suspect we should just remove it altogether.
>
> Does anybody actually _use_ /proc/kcore? It was one of those "cool
> feature" things, but I certainly haven't ever used it myself except for
> testing, and it's historically often been broken after various kernel
> infrastructure updates, and people haven't complained..
>
> Comments?
I've used it on a few rare occasions for last-ditch data recovery
before, E.G. an application crashed that had a text file held in RAM
that wasn't ever written to disk. Poking through /proc/kcore could
allow it's recovery.
Probably not a sufficent reason to keep it :-).
John.
next reply other threads:[~2003-08-14 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-14 17:16 John Bradford [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-14 17:42 [PATCH] Make modules work in Linus' tree on ARM Luck, Tony
2003-08-14 12:08 Russell King
2003-08-14 16:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-08-14 16:32 ` Russell King
2003-09-17 9:23 ` Russell King
2003-08-14 16:47 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-14 16:55 ` John Levon
2003-08-14 17:06 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-14 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-08-14 17:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-08-14 17:30 ` John Levon
2003-08-14 17:24 ` Russell King
2003-08-14 20:12 ` Eli Carter
2003-08-14 20:42 ` Russell King
2003-08-18 19:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200308141716.h7EHGfqg000643@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk \
--to=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).