From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S269958AbTHOWGK (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 15 Aug 2003 18:06:10 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269144AbTHOWGJ
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 15 Aug 2003 18:06:09 -0400
Received: from mail.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:58241 "EHLO
	mail.jlokier.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271025AbTHOWFW
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 15 Aug 2003 18:05:22 -0400
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:05:02 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, Val Henson <val@nmt.edu>,
       David Wagner <daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make cryptoapi non-optional?
Message-ID: <20030815220502.GB19707@mail.jlokier.co.uk>
References: <20030809173329.GU31810@waste.org> <20030813032038.GA1244@think> <20030813040614.GP31810@waste.org> <20030814165320.GA2839@speare5-1-14> <bhgoj9$9ab$1@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu> <20030815001713.GD5333@speare5-1-14> <20030815093003.A2784@pclin040.win.tue.nl> <20030815150324.GX325@waste.org> <20030815190408.A3071@pclin040.win.tue.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030815190408.A3071@pclin040.win.tue.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Andries Brouwer wrote:
> Then the statement has nothing to do with the xor and is just
>  entropy(x) >= entropy(a)
> assuming that x has maximal possible entropy.
> 
> Well, yes, indeed.

I think you just said what I said in a long, complicated message a few
minutes ago, but much more succinctly.

:)
-- Jamie