From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271713AbTHRMY5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 08:24:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271714AbTHRMY5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 08:24:57 -0400 Received: from pub234.cambridge.redhat.com ([213.86.99.234]:1292 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271713AbTHRMYy (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 08:24:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:24:51 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Cc: Dominik.Strasser@t-online.de, hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] scsi.h uses "u8" which isn't defined. Message-ID: <20030818132451.A22393@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, Dominik.Strasser@t-online.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl on Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:19:41PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:19:41PM +0200, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > The right approach is not to break userspace without any kernel > benefit whatsoever, but to eliminate the accumulated cruft from > scsi.h. Userspace is supposed to use the glibc which is there for exactly that reason.