From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272069AbTHRPge (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:36:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272070AbTHRPge (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:36:34 -0400 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:62372 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272069AbTHRPgc (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:36:32 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Jamie Lokier Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] use simple_strtoul for unsigned kernel parameters In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:09:55 +0100." <20030818120955.GB7147@mail.jlokier.co.uk> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 01:32:59 +1000 Message-Id: <20030818153632.98AF22C0DA@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In message <20030818120955.GB7147@mail.jlokier.co.uk> you write: > Rusty Russell wrote: > > In message <20030818004618.GA5094@mail.jlokier.co.uk> you write: > > > The largest "unsigned int" value doesn't fit in a "long", on many machines. > > > So we should use simple_strtoul, not simple_strtol, to decode these values. > > > > Half right. The second part is fine, the first part is redundant > > Do you mean the first part of the comment or the first part of the patch? > > Assuming you mean the patch, you're right: the unsigned short case > doesn't need to be changed. It should be anyway because it is just > the right thing to do. . Linus took the patch. If you think it's the Right Thing, great. Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.